The spectre of famine is casting a long, dark shadow over Sudan. A nation already grappling with decades of conflict, political instability, and economic hardship now faces a humanitarian crisis of unprecedented proportions. As the situation worsens, a critical question emerges: is this famine the result of deliberate actions, or is it an unfortunate confluence of circumstances?
The factors contributing to the famine in Sudan are complex and intertwined. On the one hand, the ongoing conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has devastated the country, displacing millions and disrupting essential services. Hospitals, schools, and infrastructure have been reduced to rubble, leaving civilians vulnerable and isolated.
The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) reports that over four million people have been internally displaced, while hundreds of thousands have fled to neighbouring countries. These populations are living in dire conditions, with limited access to food, water, and healthcare.
Moreover, the conflict has severely impacted agricultural production. Farmers have been unable to cultivate their land, leading to a sharp decline in food availability. The World Food Programme (WFP) has warned of an impending food crisis, with millions facing acute hunger.
Climate change has further exacerbated the situation. Sudan is already highly vulnerable to climate shocks, experiencing recurrent droughts and floods. Changing climate patterns have disrupted agricultural livelihoods, reduced crop yields, and driven up food prices.
Deliberate or Unfortunate?
While the combination of conflict, displacement, and climate change has created fertile ground for famine, allegations of deliberate targeting of civilians and obstruction of humanitarian aid have raised concerns about the role of human intent in the crisis.
Human Rights Watch has documented numerous attacks on civilians, including hospitals, schools, and residential areas. These attacks have resulted in mass casualties and further displacement, worsening the humanitarian crisis.
Additionally, there have been reports of deliberate obstruction of humanitarian aid convoys. Aid workers have encountered difficulties accessing affected areas, hindering the delivery of life-saving assistance. Such actions could be seen as a deliberate attempt to exacerbate the suffering of the population.
Amgad Fareid Eltayeb, Executive Director of the Khartoum-based Fikra for Studies and Development, stated, “Sudan is experiencing a deliberate process of starvation by the Rapid Support Forces,” which he claims are “intentionally depriving civilians of access to essential sustenance.”
On the other hand, some argue that the famine is primarily the result of a complex interplay of factors, with no clear evidence of a deliberate plan to starve the population. They point out that the conflict itself has created a chaotic environment where humanitarian access is extremely challenging, regardless of intent.
Irrespective of the underlying causes, the human cost of the famine is immeasurable. Millions of people are on the brink of starvation, with children being the most vulnerable. Malnutrition rates are soaring, leading to increased mortality and morbidity.
A Possible Path Forward
Addressing the famine in Sudan requires a multi-faceted approach. Immediate humanitarian assistance is crucial to save lives and prevent further suffering.
Immediate Relief and Stabilisation
Humanitarian organisations must ensure safe access to those in need, including protection for aid workers and the removal of bureaucratic hurdles. Scaling up food aid distribution, prioritising supplementary feeding programmes for children, pregnant women, and lactating mothers, and expanding access to essential healthcare services such as immunisation and disease prevention are critical. Providing clean water, sanitation facilities, and promoting hygiene are also vital to prevent the spread of waterborne diseases.
Addressing Root Causes
Establishing a durable ceasefire and promoting peace negotiations are crucial for enabling humanitarian aid and recovery efforts. Strengthening governance structures and ensuring accountability will ensure that resources are used transparently. Economic recovery, through job creation, investment, and trade facilitation, will improve livelihoods and food security. Investing in agricultural programmes will boost food production and reduce reliance on aid.
Building Resilience
Social protection programmes, early warning systems for climate hazards, and climate-resilient agriculture, water management, and disaster risk reduction are essential for coping with shocks and building resilience in vulnerable populations. Investing in education and nutrition programmes for children is also crucial for long-term human development and food security.
READ ALSO: Addressing Hunger in War-Torn Sudan
International Cooperation and Funding
To meet Sudan’s growing humanitarian needs, it is essential to mobilise additional funding, improve coordination among agencies, governments, and local organisations, and raise awareness about the crisis while advocating for political solutions to ensure sustained support.
The success of these strategies in Sudan depends on a comprehensive approach that addresses both immediate needs and long-term development challenges. Local communities and organisations are crucial to ensuring relevance and sustainability. The international community must support the Sudanese people by providing financial assistance, deploying peacekeeping forces, and imposing targeted sanctions on those responsible for violence.
Ultimately, the responsibility to end the suffering in Sudan lies with the Sudanese people themselves. A peaceful and inclusive political process is essential for rebuilding the country and creating a future where all citizens can live in dignity and prosperity.
